Jackie Powers' Literary Midwife Blog

Printer-friendly version Send to friend PDF version

The Perfect Book

I finished the latest book by my favorite author, and then the next day I picked it up and read it again.  In the process of reading it the second time, I revised my "The Perfect Book" criteria.

My "The Perfect Book" criteria used to be:

When I pick up The Perfect Book a second time, I read every word again.

Because when a book is good enough that I want to read it again, the biggest issue I run into is that most of the time the authors dump big chunks of too much information and backstory into the story.  So when I go back to read the book again, I already know all that information and end up skipping big chunks of the book the second time around.

It's a joy when I run into a book that's so skillfully written that the backstory is seamlessly interwoven into the story and it's no hardship to read every word the second time.  I really, really enjoy those stories, and applaud those authors.  I want to write like that!  :-)

After I read this book, I was able to verbalize this situation and thereby modified my criteria:

When I read The Perfect Book a second (or more) time, not only do I read every word, but each time I reread it, I pick up new information and nuances, thereby learning more about the plot and characters, and deepening my experience with every reading.

Wow!  :-)  Not only was the book a great read the first time, but I got so sucked into the action of the story and I was so focused on the action, that I missed nuances.  Then I read it a second time, and because I knew what was up, I was able to enjoy it even more, because I was able to pick up the little bits I missed the first time.  And I suspect that if I read it again, I will pick up even more. (Read more)

Arrived and Online

After much work, angst and adventure, I arrived in Texas early Thursday morning.  Unpacking the truck took all day Thursday, as it was 104-degrees out.  Not fun.

Since then we have all been unpacking, sorting and arranging.  Finally, today, I found the box with my computer cables, so I'm back online.

Much to do.  Many adjustments to make.  But, it's good to be with my folks, and #1-son and #2-son.  Today we all went down to visit with two of my three brothers and their families, so that's nice, too.

I miss #3-son and #4-son, though.  :-( 

#3-son is off to college and having a grand time, so I can handle that. 

But I haven't been away from #4-son for more than the two-weeks he went on vacation last year, so this is going to be a challenge.  I haven't had a chance to do more than text with him a couple times, but now that I'm finally back online, I should be able to talk to him more, which will be nice.

Now that my computer is together and I've said 'hi' to everybody online, I'd best get this place cleaned back up and head to bed.  The lack of sleep and stress from the last couple weeks is catching up with me, and I'm exhausted, but all-in-all, I'm doing really well.

My First Acknowledgement

I am so tickled!  Adrienne Giordano's second book, "A Just Deception", is about to be released from Carina Press and she passed along the finalized copy and see what it says in the acknowledgements:

I must, must, must acknowledge Jackie Powers and her wonderful insight when working through early characterization issues. Your advice helped me dig deep and I’m so grateful.

She wanted to surprise me, and I was surpirsed, and gratified.

Thanks, Adrienne!  I had a great time talking with you, I didn't expect this, and I'm really looking forward to reading the final draft.  :-)

Wow!!  **grin**

TSTL* - Too Stupid To Live

    A while back, I finished reading a book by a big-name author and was completely disgusted by the hero and heroine.  About three-quarters of the way into the book, the hero makes a TSTL* (Too Stupid To Live) decision that I couldn't believe, and then to make the situation even worse, this TSTL decision was promptly followed by the heroine upping the TSTL quotient, to the point that I almost threw the book against the wall.  The only saving grace was that I bought the book off the bargain rack and didn't pay full price for it.

    As I thought about the book, I realized that the author needed to get the hero and heroine (H&H) into a bad situation.  Okay.  I understand that.  They needed to be there for the rest of the plot to work.  I'm good with Hs&Hs being put in bad situations.

    What wasn't okay with me was that in order to get into this nasty situation, the H&H had to make several TSLT decisions in a row.  Morons!

    So I thought some more:  There are plenty of good books out there where the H&H end up in nasty situations without making TSTL decisions.  So why did this author do it this way?

    About a day later, the answer came to me.  In this book, the villains were so stupid that they were beyond TSTL-stupid!

    Ah! I thought, that's what the problem is.

    The plot needed the H&H to get captured, but the villains were so incompetent that they couldn't capture the H&H on their own, which meant the H&H needed to be even more stupid than the villains.  **sigh**

    Why?!?

    So, here's the lesson: (Read more)

Critical Reading of a Beginning

A friend is trying to sell her first book but not getting good responses from agents and editors, and she's getting very frustrated and depressed about the whole process.  I read her book a couple times during the editing process, but I hadn't seen the version that she's shopping around.  When she emailed me the other day that her new website is live, out of curiosity, I popped over to check it out, and I couldn't resist taking a quick glance at the first chapter she had posted.

When I read the first sentence, my thought was "It's no wonder everybody is turning her down, because I'd turn her down, too."  Which is sad because she's a marvelous storyteller.  But the sloppy mechanics of the beginning sentences of her book overshadow her fantastic storytelling ability.

 

So how does the begin?  I'll give you the first paragraph (with the character's name and details changed)

Chapter 1
Montana
Thursday, September 2, 1908: Afternoon

      George Martin ran with perspiration matting his hair and streaming down his face. He gave an impatient shake of his head to clear his eyes only to stumble over a stone and almost fall. Regaining his balance, he doggedly ran on. If he just could run fast enough, he might be able to get home and avert disaster. He might be able to keep the horriblness away, and so he prayed as he ran, the prayers bursting through his clenched teeth in disjointed rasps of desperation. “Holy Mother of God…dear Jesus…oh God please, please, please…dear God, please…”

and now, my thought process as I read it, so you can understand how a critical-reader (editor/agent) might process your story as they read it.

Montana
Thursday, September 2, 1908: Afternoon
(Read more)

Editing Is The Hard Part

From the email bag:

Editing is the hard part, and I keep trying to avoid it. It's easier to get on with the next book, but I'll never move up the ladder to published if I do that. Writing, getting that first draft out of your head, is just so much fun. The rest, editing, is painful, but challenging.

 

And yes, I understand completely about the "editing" part of the writing process.  It's not fun.  :-( 

When the words of the story just pour out of you in that rush of creating the first draft, that's grand fun.  When the writing is going great, there isn't a high like it in the world.  Then the book is done, it's time to edit, and the let-down is awful.

The good news is that once you do learn to fix something in the editing process-- like an error that managed to spread itself across your entire manuscript, which I've done more times than I care to admit --you've practiced the fix so much that it has become unconscious and **drum roll** you never have to fix it again.  (Or at least if it does sneak in, the fix is on a much smaller scale.)

So each book that you write requires less editing, because with each book you've edited you learned all those lessons so they are automatic in the writing process.

Look at it like you're learning a new skill, maybe playing the piano.  It doesn't come automatically, you have to practice.  And "editing" your manuscript is the practice part. (Read more)

Genre & Sub-Genre


The basis for the following lists are from www.FictionFactor.com/genre.html and  www.cuebon.com/ewriters/genres.html (see their website for definition of the sub-genres), with additions from various other sources. (Read more)

Deciding Your Story's Genre

Deciding your story's genre is one of the first decisions you have to make when writing a novel or short story.  Experienced writers often know the genre before the story is begun, but it's not unusual for the inexperienced writer to be faced with the decision after the first draft is completed.

Why is a story's genre so important?  Can't I just write any story I want?

For a short story, its genre decides which magazines/e-zines you can send your story to, or which anthologies you can submit to.  Therefore, if you have a magazine in mind, you need to write a story that adheres to their genre guidelines if you want to be accepted.

For a novel, the genre most obviously decides where in the bookstore the book will be shelved.  But genre also decides many other things for a novel, including:

  • the audience for your book;
  • often, major plot line requirements;
  • what un-written rules will have to be adhered to;
  • sometimes, the length of the book;
  • which agents you'll submit to, as they often specialize in their favorite genres;
  • and which publishing houses and imprints you'll submit to.

Okay, I can see that it's important, but what is "genre"?

Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines "genre" as "a category of artistic, musical, or literary composition characterized by a particular style, form, or content."  So, for a story, the "genre" of the story is the "category" of the story "characterized by a particular style, form, or content." (Read more)

Revision Letters Part 2: Symptoms

You have received a revision letter from an editor or agent, or any kind of detailed critique, and you're falling apart at the seams.  How can you fix the situation so you can do what needs to be done?

First, you need to: Take your ego out of the whole situation.  See Revision Letters Part 1: Ego

After you've done this, the second part of dealing with revison letters and critique is to:

View every critique as a list of symptoms not a list of factual problems or issues.

 

Because most times, a "problem" exists in the manuscript long before it grows big enough for the reader to notice. 

So an editor can say "fix X"... but the real problem isn't "X"... because "X" just happened to be the first place the issue got big enough for the editor to notice that something was wrong.  The real problem is "Y" that happened three chapters before, and in the intervening chapters "Y" _grew_ into "X".

So, instead of taking the editor/agent at their literal word and fixing "X", which doesn't fix the real problem, because the real problem wasn't "X" it was "Y"...

View "fix X" as a symptom, apply some brain cells to the situation and say to yourself:

"The editor says 'fix X', but is 'X' a real issue in itself, or a symptom of something else?"

Sometimes "X" is the real issue, but a lot more of time it's only a symptom of something else.

Revision Letters Part 1: Ego

You have received a revision letter from an editor or agent, or any kind of detailed critique, and you're falling apart at the seams.  How can you fix the situation so you can do what needs to be done?

First, you need to:

Take your ego out of the whole situation.

You can do this by remembering two things:

1) Edits requested for a manuscript have no bearing on you as a person.

Just because your manuscript wasn't perfect when you sent it in doesn't lessen your worth as a person. It doesn't mean you're a "failure" in any sense of the word.

In fact, edits have nothing whatsoever to do with you as a person.

You could be Mother Theresa, and if you submitted this book under a name that wasn't 'Mother Theresa', they'd still ask for the same edits.

You as a person and your worth as a person don't even come into the equation.

So save yourself the grief, and take your ego out of the equation... your manuscript isn't "you"!

2) The manuscript isn't your baby.

Getting a request to fix a manuscript doesn't mean that you're chopping off fingers or toes... because...

A manuscript is a thing.
It's a product you produced. (Read more)